User talk:Galya

Revision as of 23:42, 13 October 2023

(sorry still trying to figure out how User Talk works on here, hopefully you get this)

Yes there are people interest in the recently added undead races/pages, there is literally a big undead uprising thing going on right now. who is this "we" you are refereing to? I see absolutley no problem in defining an archetype that people have been actively complaining had no definition for the entirety of the sport's existence. there's alot of undead out here, we just had no representation on the wiki, and because of that we have basically just remained a silent majority. a few months ago me and some of the other vetran undead decided to work together to change that, we are as we speak discussing with the undead population cultural concepts and the like. we're defining the undead in the same vein that the core races got to define the term monster. I understand the confusion in that much of the pages are left with minimal information, but rome wasn't built in a day. -Dark12794 17:01, 30 January 2017

Heyy Galya, I don't know how this works either! You asked if the major difference between Bollywogs and Frog-Folk was that we don't paint up anymore. Most of us have shifted to just doing the face dots most of the time (a couple of people have expressed interest in doing the whole shebang, which, more power to em) but the name change was just because 'Bollywog' is kind of an old-timey slur for middle-eastern/south-asian people, which we didn't know when we named the race. -Khnor (October 18, 2022)

I appreciate the insight! I would suggest adding the signifiers description back onto the Frog-Folk page, just so people know what to look for. Galya (talk) 18:00, 18 October 2022 (CDT)

Hi gayla currently wondering why my Water Goblyn page isn't actually properly listed on any of the Goblyns pages. I heard you were giving my editor trouble and frankly I'm a little shocked, but would appreciate if you could please categorize my stuff properly thanks

Hi Gayla I'm a tiefling and outsider any particular reason for the passive aggressive/wildly inaccurate "disclaimer" on a race page that doesn't belong to you?

Cause you kinda just screwed up all of our races and now we can't even reedit the actual page to get rid of your childish disclaimer trying to downplay our races. We don't need to get your approval to add to our own lore, idk where you get off thinking you get to overstep your boundaries just because you're the Admin but if you don't fix it now we will be taking this to the war council that you be replaced with someone of more professional quailty.

You seem to have a pattern of making baseless accusations and decisions for races you aren't a part of SOULY based on a lack of information based on your needlessly hostile encounters with the Deathrisen the Frog-Folk and even the new Water Goblyns and as someone who's been working alongside some of those races to unify our lore I do not appreciate it. Infact I think it's an incrediblly bad look for a Witchdoctor of such high regard.

I ask that you please reconsider your actions before this goes too far.

re:Water Goblyn page

Hey there. So I did have Water Goblyns linked on the Goblyn Tribes page, but I had it categorized as an "unnamed" tribe, rather than a subtype, because at the time, there wasn't enough distinguishing characteristics to really fit as a subtype. There definitely is now though, so I moved it on both pages.